After years of lacking an official internet presence, Gary Larson recently relented and starting posting his old Far Side cartoons on a daily basis. Several of these have an IP angle to them, like this one. But what's the cause of action here - right of publicity? Copyright? Unjust enrichment? Passing off?
Recent Posts
- Why Does The Israel PTO Charge A Fee To Grant DAS Access?
- Patent Practitioners Aren't The Same As Lawyers: Quod Erat Demonstrandum redux
- Raphael Mechoulam z"l
- This Is Why The Use of Trademarks To Identify Goods In Patents Can Be Problematic
- Address for Renewal Fee Service: Another Suggestion for the Israel PTO
- USPTO Moving to Electronic Issuance of Patents
- When 1+1 Does Not Equal 2: Israel PTO Filing System Gags on Merged PDF File
- Mea Culpa, and Check Your Israel PTO Email Subscription
- Israel Reaches 300,000 Patent Applications
- Patent Practitioners Aren't The Same As Lawyers: Quod Erat Demonstrandum
Links within this blog
Humorless disclaimer: Nothing on this blog is meant to constitute legal advice. This blog doesn’t create an attorney-client relationship. This blog is not soliciting business. The accuracy of statements made in this blog is not guaranteed. The views expressed herein are those of the authors only.
« Ancient Copper Smelting and Intellectual Property | Main | Certification for Patent Searching? »
October 13, 2020
Comments
Search
Other Blogs I Read
Categories
- abandonment (12)
- abstracts (1)
- ADS (2)
- AIA (2)
- Alice (2)
- amendments (21)
- appeals (1)
- assignment (6)
- best mode (1)
- BPAI decisions (4)
- claims (21)
- commercialization (4)
- Commissioner's Circulars (62)
- compulsory licensing (5)
- copyright (9)
- crystalline forms (1)
- Current Affairs (25)
- deferred examination (2)
- designs (8)
- Divisional applications (13)
- double-patenting (10)
- electronic filing (38)
- eligibility (3)
- examination (16)
- exhaustion (3)
- extensions (12)
- false marking (2)
- humor (58)
- ILPTO decisions (42)
- indefiniteness (2)
- Inequitable Conduct (4)
- infringement (11)
- injunctions (3)
- inventorship (13)
- IPR (1)
- Laches (2)
- Legislation (55)
- licensing (9)
- methods of treatment (2)
- obviousness (5)
- on-sale bar (1)
- Oppositions (20)
- PAIR (4)
- paragraph IV (7)
- Patent Office Fees (26)
- patent term extension (12)
- Patents Database (14)
- Patents Journal (5)
- PCT (35)
- pharmaceutical (26)
- PPH (14)
- priority claim (21)
- PTAB (3)
- PTO administration (50)
- reexamination (2)
- reissue (3)
- Renewal fees (14)
- revocation (4)
- sanctions (4)
- suspension of examination (3)
- tech transfer (5)
- Trademarks (20)
- translation (2)
- Web/Tech (3)
- §17(c) (19)
- §18 (1)
Recent Comments
- hteff@thepatenters.com on Pretending They’re Listening? MOJ and Patent Practitioner Ethics Rules
- Dan Feigelson on A Time I Was Right But Wish I Wasn’t
- Joe Felber on A Time I Was Right But Wish I Wasn’t
- Joe Felber on Dr. Judith Abrahams z”l
- Bettina de Jong on Certification for Patent Searching?
- Daniel Feigelson on Certification for Patent Searching?
- Erez Gur on Certification for Patent Searching?
- Allan Farber on Why We Do Our First Filings Outside of Israel
- Daniel Feigelson on Reminders From the Patent Office Before Your Case Goes Abandoned: Has The USPTO Changed Its Policy?
- Daniel Feigelson on Reminders From the Patent Office Before Your Case Goes Abandoned: Has The USPTO Changed Its Policy?