Maria Eliseeva is a patent attorney in Massachusetts who practices before the patent offices of both the USA and Russia. Being a bilingual practitioner, she is acutely aware of the issues that can arise a result of a poorly-translated patent applications. She has now written an article about some of the problems she has encountered, particularly with translations prepared by third-party translation companies. It's worth a read. Download Who has skin in the patent translation game
Recent Posts
- Israel Patent, Design and Trademark Fees Going Up January 1, 2025
- Another Example of How Not To Advertise One's Services
- Israel PTO: Suprise! We're Closed Tomorrow!
- Current USPTO Director Listens to Former USPTO Directors and Withdraws Proposed Rule for Terminal Disclaimers
- Has Israel Captured Marvin the Martian?
- Follow-Up to "Letters Crossing in the (e-)Mail"
- Letters Crossing the (e-)Mail
- The Patent Law Treaty And Succot’s Four Species
- Are Toxic Bullet Cartridges Next For Hizbullah?
- Where Are All Those “Palestinian” Inventions?
Links within this blog
Humorless disclaimer: Nothing on this blog is meant to constitute legal advice. This blog doesn’t create an attorney-client relationship. This blog is not soliciting business. The accuracy of statements made in this blog is not guaranteed. The views expressed herein are those of the authors only.
Search
Other Blogs I Read
Categories
- abandonment (13)
- abstracts (1)
- ADS (2)
- AIA (2)
- Alice (2)
- amendments (25)
- appeals (1)
- assignment (6)
- best mode (1)
- BPAI decisions (4)
- claims (21)
- commercialization (4)
- Commissioner's Circulars (62)
- compulsory licensing (5)
- copyright (9)
- crystalline forms (1)
- Current Affairs (37)
- deferred examination (2)
- designs (10)
- Divisional applications (13)
- double-patenting (11)
- electronic filing (59)
- eligibility (3)
- examination (16)
- exhaustion (3)
- extensions (17)
- false marking (2)
- humor (65)
- ILPTO decisions (43)
- indefiniteness (2)
- Inequitable Conduct (4)
- infringement (11)
- injunctions (3)
- inventorship (13)
- IPR (1)
- Laches (2)
- Legislation (57)
- licensing (9)
- methods of treatment (2)
- obviousness (6)
- on-sale bar (1)
- Oppositions (21)
- PAIR (4)
- paragraph IV (7)
- Patent Office Fees (28)
- patent term extension (14)
- Patents Database (16)
- Patents Journal (6)
- PCT (38)
- pharmaceutical (26)
- PPH (16)
- priority claim (23)
- PTAB (3)
- PTO administration (80)
- reexamination (2)
- reissue (3)
- Renewal fees (18)
- revocation (4)
- sanctions (4)
- Sports (1)
- suspension of examination (5)
- tech transfer (5)
- Trademarks (26)
- translation (2)
- Web/Tech (3)
- §17(c) (19)
- §18 (2)
Recent Comments
- James Crowstein on Additonal Asininity from the Cretins At Columbia Law Review (and a Bit of Backbone from Board of Directors)
- Daniel Feigelson on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Daniel Feigelson on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Erez Gur on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Paul on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Dan Feigelson on The Saga of Suspensions (or, You Can’t Make This Up, Installment No. 12? 15? I’ve Lost Track)
- Erez Gur on The Saga of Suspensions (or, You Can’t Make This Up, Installment No. 12? 15? I’ve Lost Track)
- Dan Feigelson on Update from Rehovot
- Jonathan Kaltner on Update from Rehovot
- Allen on New Israel PTO Patent Electronic Filing System - Introductory Meeting