As if life weren't exciting enough these days, the ILPTO issued a clarification (in both Hebrew and in English) to its earlier announcement about work arrangements during the coronavirus shut-down: since the statute imposes a 90-day limit to record a pledge against a patent, the ILPTO will continue to process the recording of such pledges. And if you're a patent practitioner trainee and you're now on unpaid leave, you should read the announcement.
Recent Posts
- Where Are All Those “Palestinian” Inventions?
- From the Mouths of Babes, vol. 2 (or, Steph Curry Couldn’t Have Been Clearer)
- Israel Patent Office Changes Policy On Suspension of Examination…But Still Acts Ultra Vires
- Wait And See: Don't Pay For, Let Alone Charge The Client For, An Unnecessary Extension Fee
- If you're going to do a job, you may as well do it half-assed (USPTO's new IDS form)
- Columbia Law Review Board of Directors Shows Its True Colors
- No More AI Prior Art Searches at the ILPTO (at Least for Now)
- Additonal Asininity from the Cretins At Columbia Law Review (and a Bit of Backbone from Board of Directors)
- Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Israel PTO, Where’s My Patent Application? (System Takes Money but Loses an Electronically Filed Application)
Links within this blog
Humorless disclaimer: Nothing on this blog is meant to constitute legal advice. This blog doesn’t create an attorney-client relationship. This blog is not soliciting business. The accuracy of statements made in this blog is not guaranteed. The views expressed herein are those of the authors only.
Search
Other Blogs I Read
Categories
- abandonment (13)
- abstracts (1)
- ADS (2)
- AIA (2)
- Alice (2)
- amendments (25)
- appeals (1)
- assignment (6)
- best mode (1)
- BPAI decisions (4)
- claims (21)
- commercialization (4)
- Commissioner's Circulars (62)
- compulsory licensing (5)
- copyright (9)
- crystalline forms (1)
- Current Affairs (35)
- deferred examination (2)
- designs (10)
- Divisional applications (13)
- double-patenting (10)
- electronic filing (57)
- eligibility (3)
- examination (16)
- exhaustion (3)
- extensions (16)
- false marking (2)
- humor (62)
- ILPTO decisions (43)
- indefiniteness (2)
- Inequitable Conduct (4)
- infringement (11)
- injunctions (3)
- inventorship (13)
- IPR (1)
- Laches (2)
- Legislation (57)
- licensing (9)
- methods of treatment (2)
- obviousness (6)
- on-sale bar (1)
- Oppositions (21)
- PAIR (4)
- paragraph IV (7)
- Patent Office Fees (28)
- patent term extension (14)
- Patents Database (16)
- Patents Journal (6)
- PCT (38)
- pharmaceutical (26)
- PPH (16)
- priority claim (22)
- PTAB (3)
- PTO administration (76)
- reexamination (2)
- reissue (3)
- Renewal fees (18)
- revocation (4)
- sanctions (4)
- Sports (1)
- suspension of examination (5)
- tech transfer (5)
- Trademarks (26)
- translation (2)
- Web/Tech (3)
- §17(c) (19)
- §18 (2)
Recent Comments
- James Crowstein on Additonal Asininity from the Cretins At Columbia Law Review (and a Bit of Backbone from Board of Directors)
- Daniel Feigelson on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Daniel Feigelson on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Erez Gur on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Paul on Israel PTO Announces Expedited Examination of Patent Applications Claiming Priority from Provisional Applications
- Dan Feigelson on The Saga of Suspensions (or, You Can’t Make This Up, Installment No. 12? 15? I’ve Lost Track)
- Erez Gur on The Saga of Suspensions (or, You Can’t Make This Up, Installment No. 12? 15? I’ve Lost Track)
- Dan Feigelson on Update from Rehovot
- Jonathan Kaltner on Update from Rehovot
- Allen on New Israel PTO Patent Electronic Filing System - Introductory Meeting